proposed replacement bylaws

[Bill Allombert]

On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 03:34:12PM +0200, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> 
> So, I guess there's a trade-off here.  We can have really simple bylaws
> and give the board the ability to modify them, trusting that our nearly
> complete transparency of operations and the legal context in which we
> operate provide the ability to observe and react should the board ever
> "go nuts".  I'm quite comfortable with this approach, but I recognize
> that not everyone may be.

I suppose a lot of people would consider a board changing the bylaws without
approval from the members to be going nuts.

Cheers,
Bill.