Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors

Manoj Srivastava srivasta at
Sat Feb 22 20:37:45 UTC 2003

>>>>> In article <20030222200329.GB2665 at iliana>, Sven Luther
>>>>> <luther at> writes: 

 > On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 02:56:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson / SPI
 > Treasurer wrote: 

 > Err,

 > Citing yourself on Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:48:12 +0100 :
 >> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:25:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
 >> > I suppose not voting for all 8 candidate (that is providing a
 >> > string with less than 8 characters) will result in "none of the
 >> > above" to rank higher than the candidates not figuring in the
 >> > string, right ?
 >> It certainly should, or the vote tabulating software is
 >> horrendously buggy and should not be trusted to return valid
 >> results.

 > As i understand it, this is the complete oposite of what you are
 > now claiming, i may be wrong or have misunderstood something
 > though.

	I do not think this is relevant, since there _was_ no none of
 the above option in this vote. (I now think that the current Debian
 voting draft is vindicated by this confusion, since that insists on
 having a default option for most votes).

"Is this foreplay?" "No, this is Nuke Strike.  Foreplay has lousy
graphics.  Beat me again." Duckert, in "Bad Rubber," Albedo #0
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta at>  <>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

More information about the Spi-general mailing list